Wat is implicit bias?

• LERU (2018). Implicit bias in academia.
• Kirwan Institute (2015). State of the Science: Implicit Bias Review.
• Athena’s Angels, Nederlandse website over de uitdagingen die vrouwen tegenkomen in een wetenschappelijke loopbaan.
• Kang J (2011). Bits of Bias. UCLA School of Law Research Paper No. 11-40.
• Miller et al. (2018). The Development of Children’s Gender-Science Stereotypes: A Meta-analysis of 5 Decades of U.S. Draw-A-Scientist Studies. Child Development. 89(6):1943-1955.
• EY Peterson Institute report (2016). Is Gender Diversity Profitable? Evidence from a Global Survey.

Over vacatures

• Gaucher D, Friesen J, Kay AC (2011). Evidence that gendered wording in job advertisements exists and sustains gender inequality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 101(1):109-28.
• Born MP, Taris TW ( 2010). The impact of the wording of employment advertisements on students’ inclination to apply for a job. Journal of Social Psychology. 150(5):485-502.

Over aanbevelingsbrieven

• Trix, F & Psenka, C (2003). Exploring the color of glass: letters of recommendation for female and male medical faculty. Discourse & Society, 14(2), 191-220.
• Leslie SJ, Cimpian A, Meyer M, Freeland E (2015). Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science. 347(6219):262-5.
• Morgan, Elder & King (2013). The emergence and reduction of bias in letters of recommendation. journal of applied Social psychology, 43(11),2297-2306.
• Bian, Lin,Leslie, Sarah-Jane,Cimpian, Andrei (2018). Evidence of bias against girls and women in contexts that emphasize intellectual ability. American Psychologist, Vol 73(9), 1139-1153.

Over geselecteerd worden voor posities en loopbaanondersteuning

• Moss-Racusin et al. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS). 109(41):16474-16479.
• Van den Brink & Benschop (2012). Gender practices in the construction of academic excellence: Sheep with five legs. Organization. 19(4): 507-524.
• Isaak C, Lee B, Carnes M (2009). Interventions that affect gender bias in hiring: a systematic review. Academic Medicine. 84(10): 1440–1446.
• Wenneras C & Wold A (1997). Nepotism and sexism in peer-review. Nature. 387: 341–343.
• Ahlqvist V., Andersson J., Söderqvist l. & Tumpone J. (2015). A gender-neutral process? A qualitative study of the evaluation of research grant applications.
• van der Lee R, Ellemers N (2015). Gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS). 112(40): 12349-12353.

Over geciteerd worden en mogelijkheid tot samenwerking

• Kaatz 2015. A Quantitative Linguistic Analysis of National Institutes of Health R01 Application Critiques from Investigators at One Institution. Academic Medicine. 90(1): 69–75.

Over uitgenodigd worden als spreker op congressen

• Schroeder et al (2013). Fewer invited talks by women in evolutionary biology symposia. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 26(9):2063-9.
• Casadevall A, Handelsman J (2014). The Presence of Female Conveners Correlates with a Higher Proportion of Female Speakers at Scientific Symposia. MBio. 5(1):e00846-13.
• Isbell et al. (2012). Stag Parties Linger: Continued Gender Bias in a Female-Rich Scientific Discipline. PLoS One. 7(11):e49682.

Over onderwijsevaluaties

• MacNell et al. (2014). What’s in a Name: Exposing Gender Bias in Student Ratings of Teaching. Innovative Higher Education. 40(4): 291–303.
• Bachen, C. M., McLoughlin, M. M., & Garcia, S. (1999). Assessing the role of gender in college students’ evaluation of faculty. Communication Education, 48, 193-210.
• Basow, S. A., & Silberg, N. T. (1987). Student evaluations of college professors: Are female and male professors rated differently?. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(3), 308-314.
• Boring, A. (2017). Gender biases in student evaluations of teaching. Journal of Public Economics, 145, 27–41.
• Feldman, K. A. (2007). Identifying exemplary teachers and teaching: Evidence from student ratings. In R. Perry & J. Smart (Eds.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective (pp. 93-129). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
• Goodwin, L. D., & Stevens, E. A. (1993). The influence of gender on university faculty members’ perceptions of “good” teaching. Journal of Higher Education, 64(2), 166-185.
• Hancock, G. R., Shannon, D. M., & Trentham, L. I. (1992). Student and teacher gender in ratings of university faculty: Results from five colleges of study. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 6, 235-248.
• Mitchell, K. M. W., & Martin, J. (2018). Gender effects on student evaluations of faculty. PS – Political Science and Politics, 51(3), 648–652.
• Sandler, B. R. (1991). Women faculty at work in the classroom, or, why it still hurts to be a woman in labor. Communication Education, 40, 6-15.
• Tatro, C. N. (1995). Gender effects on student evaluations of faculty. Communication Education, 40, 6-15.

Bias ten opzichte van onderzoek naar gender bias

• Moss-Racusin, C. A., Molenda, A. K., & Cramer, C. R. (2015). Can evidence impact attitudes? Public reactions to evidence of gender bias in STEM fields. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39, 194-209.
• Handley, I. A., Brown, E. R., Moss-Racusin, C. A., & Smith, J. L. (2015). Quality of evidence revealing gender bias in science in the eye of the beholder. PNAS, 112.43, 13201-13206.
• Van den Brink, Marieke (2015). The Politics of knowledge: the responses to feminist research from academic leaders. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 34.6, 483-495.

Bias in de praktijk

Over casual sexism in de wetenschap

• Did this really happen?. Sexisme in de wetenschap in cartoons.
• Illustrating Casual Sexism in Science. Over ‘Did this really happen?’.
• Everyday sexism in STEM.

Facts and Figures

• Vlaamse Interuniversitaire Raad. Gelijkekansenrapport van de Vlaamse universiteiten.

Toolbox

• European Institute for Gender Equality (2018). Gender Equality in Academia and Research (GEAR) tool .
• LERU (2018). Implicit bias in academia.
• Harvard implicit bias toolkit. Test je eigen bias.
• Institució CERCA. Recruitment bias in research institutes. Bewustmakingsvideo voor leden van selectiecommissies.
• Fondation L’Oréal. Male champions for women in science. Charter of commitments.